Compilation of API drug master file with reference to ICH M4 Q (R1) guideline
This article is a summary of contents that should be
part of API drug master file.
Contents are referenced from ICH M4 Q (R1) guideline. Since this article is
based on ICH guidelines, no changes have
been made to content of guidelines
and most of the data is included in as is
form from the guideline. The information which is included in as is form is represented by “#” symbol at the end of respective
title.
Module 2: Quality overall summary (QOS).
As the name
suggests, this module should contain section wise summary of information which
is presented in module 3.
Information that should be part of QOS:
- ü Sufficient information from each section to provide
the quality reviewer with an overview of module 3.
- ü Should emphasize on critical key parameters of the
product.
- ü In case, any guideline is not followed in module 3,
justification of the same should be included.
Information that should NOT be part of QOS:
- Ø
Information,
data or justification that was not already included in Module 3 or in other
parts of the CTD.
- Ø
QOS
normally should not exceed 40 pages of text, excluding tables and figures.
Below is a brief
description summary of contents that should be included in quality over all
summary (QOS).
Section number
|
Section name
|
2.3.S.1
|
General information
|
2.3.S.2
|
Manufacturer
|
2.3.S.3
|
Characterisation
|
2.3.S.4
|
Control of drug substance
|
2.3.S.5
|
Reference standards or materials
|
2.3.S.6
|
Container closure system
|
2.3.S.7
|
Stability
|
Section 2.3.S.1 General information
- Summarized (but not complete) Information included in section
3.2.S.1 should be presented.
Section 2.3.S.2 Manufacturer #
- Information on the manufacturer;
- A
brief description of the manufacturing process (including, for example,
reference to starting materials, critical steps, and reprocessing) and the
controls that are intended to result in the routine and consistent production
of material(s) of appropriate quality;
- A flow diagram, as provided in 3.2.S.2.2;
- A description of the source and Starting Material and raw materials of biological origin used in the manufacture of the drug substance, as described in 3.2.S.2.3;
- A discussion of the selection and justification of critical manufacturing steps, process controls, and acceptance criteria. Highlight critical process intermediates, as described in 3.2.S.2.4;
- A description of process validation and/or evaluation, as described in 3.2.S.2.5.
- A brief summary of major manufacturing
changes made throughout development and conclusions from the assessment used to
evaluate product consistency, as described in 3.2.S.2.6. The QOS should also
cross-refer to the non-clinical and clinical studies that used batches affected
by these manufacturing changes, as provided in the CTD-S and CTD-E modules of
the dossier.
Section 2.3.S.3 Characterisation
- A summary of the interpretation of
evidence of structure and isomerism, as described in 3.2.S.3.1 and 3.2.S.3.2
should be included.
Section 2.3.S.4 Control of Drug Substance
- Brief summary of information included in
section 3.2.S.4.1 specification should be included. This can be in tabular
format.
- Similarly, summarized information on
section 3.2.S.4.2 and 3.2.S.4.3 should be included.
- For batch analysis, tabulated summary of
section 3.2.S.4.4 should be presented. E.g.:
Parameters
|
Specification
|
Batch 001
|
Batch 002
|
Batch
003
|
Description
|
Abc
|
|||
Solubility
|
Xyz
|
Section 2.3.S.5 Reference Standards or Materials #
- Information from 3.2.S.5 (tabulated presentation, where appropriate) should be included.
Section 2.3.S.6 Container closure system #
- A brief description and discussion of the information, from 3.2.S.6 should be included.
Section 2.3.S.7 Stability #
This section should include
a summary of the studies undertaken (conditions, batches, analytical
procedures) and a brief discussion of the results and conclusions, the proposed
storage conditions, retest date or shelf-life, where relevant, as described in
3.2.S.7.1.
The post-approval
stability protocol, as described in 3.2.S.7.2, should be included.
A tabulated summary of
the stability results from 3.2.S.7.3, with graphical representation
where appropriate, should
be provided.
Module 3.2.S Drug Substance
Section number
|
Section name
|
Reference ICH Guidelines
|
3.2.S.1
|
General
information
|
|
3.2.S.1.1
|
Nomenclature
|
|
3.2.S.1.2
|
Structure
|
|
3.2.S.1.3
|
General properties
|
|
3.2.S.2
|
Manufacturer
|
|
3.2.S.2.1
|
Manufacturer(s)
|
|
3.2.S.2.2
|
Description of manufacturing process and process
controls
|
|
3.2.S.2.3
|
Control of materials
|
|
3.2.S.2.4
|
Control of critical steps and intermediates
|
|
3.2.S.2.5
|
Process validation and evaluation
|
|
3.2.S.2.6
|
Manufacturing process development
|
|
3.2.S.3
|
Characterisation
|
|
3.2.S.3.1
|
Elucidation of structure and other characteristics
|
|
3.2.S.3.2
|
Impurities
|
|
3.2.S.4
|
Control
of drug substance
|
|
3.2.S.4.1
|
Specification
|
|
3.2.S.4.2
|
Analytical procedures
|
|
3.2.S.4.3
|
Validation of analytical procedures
|
|
3.2.S.4.4
|
Batch analysis
|
|
3.2.S.4.5
|
Justification of specification
|
|
3.2.S.5
|
Reference
standards or materials
|
|
3.2.S.6
|
Container
closure system
|
|
3.2.S.7
|
Stability
|
|
3.2.S.7.1
|
Stability summary and conclusions
|
|
3.2.S.7.2
|
Post approval stability protocol and stability
commitment
|
|
3.2.S.7.3
|
Stability data
|
3.1. TABLE OF CONTENTS OF MODULE 3
A Table of Contents for
the filed application should be provided.
3.2. BODY OF DATA
3.2.S DRUG SUBSTANCE
3.2.S.1 General Information (name, manufacturer) #
3.2.S.1.1 Nomenclature
Information on the
nomenclature of the drug substance should be provided. For example:
- Recommended International Non-proprietary
Name (INN);
- Compendial name if relevant;
- Chemical name(s);
- Company or laboratory code;
- Other non-proprietary name(s), e.g.,
national name, United States Adopted Name (USAN), Japanese Accepted Name (JAN);
British Approved Name (BAN), and
- Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry
number.
3.2.S.1.3 General Properties
A list should be provided
of physicochemical and other relevant properties of the drug substance,
including biological activity for Biotech.
Examples that should be included
are description, solubility profile, pH values, melting point, boiling point,
polymorphism, isomerism etc.
3.2.S.2 Manufacture #
3.2.S.2.1 Manufacturer(s)
The name, address, and
responsibility of each manufacturer, including contractors, and each proposed
production site or facility involved in manufacturing and testing should be
provided.
3.2.S.2.2 Description of Manufacturing Process and Process Controls
The description of the
drug substance manufacturing process represents the applicant’s commitment for
the manufacture of the drug substance.
Information should be provided to adequately describe the manufacturing
process and process controls.
A flow diagram of the
synthetic process(es) should be provided that includes molecular formulae,
weights, yield ranges, chemical structures of starting materials,
intermediates, reagents and drug substance reflecting stereochemistry, and
identifies operating conditions and solvents.
A sequential procedural
narrative of the manufacturing process should be submitted. The narrative should include, for example,
quantities of raw materials, solvents, catalysts and reagents reflecting the
representative batch scale for commercial manufacture, identification of
critical steps, process controls, equipment and operating conditions (e.g.,
temperature, pressure, pH, time).
Alternate processes should
be explained and described with the same level of detail as the primary
process. Reprocessing steps should be
identified and justified. Any data to
support this justification should be either referenced or filed in 3.2.S.2.5.
3.2.S.2.3 Control of Materials #
Materials used in the
manufacture of the drug substance (e.g., raw materials, starting materials,
solvents, reagents, catalysts) should be listed identifying where each material
is used in the process. Information on
the quality and control of these materials should be provided.
3.2.S.2.4 Controls of Critical Steps and Intermediates #
Critical
Steps: Tests and
acceptance criteria (with justification including experimental data) performed
at critical steps identified in 3.2.S.2.2 of the manufacturing process to
ensure that the process is controlled should be provided.
Intermediates: Information on the quality and control of
intermediates isolated during the process should be provided. All in-process
specifications, intermediate specifications and its certificate of analysis
should be included in this section.
3.2.S.2.5 Process Validation and/or Evaluation #
Process validation and/or
evaluation studies for aseptic processing and sterilisation should be included.
A process validation report should be attached in this section of drug master
file.
3.2.S.2.6 Manufacturing Process Development #
A description and
discussion should be provided of the significant changes made to the
manufacturing process and/or manufacturing site of the drug substance used in
producing nonclinical, clinical, scale-up, pilot, and, if available, production
scale batches. Reference should be made to the drug substance data provided in
section 3.2.S.4.4.
Reference ICH Guideline:
Q3A
3.2.S.3 Characterisation #
3.2.S.3.1 Elucidation of Structure and other Characteristics
Confirmation of structure
based on e.g., synthetic route and spectral analyses should be provided.
Information such as the potential for isomerism, the identification of
stereochemistry, or the potential for forming polymorphs should also be
included.
3.2.S.3.2 Impurities
This section is most
important part of drug master file. This part can also be termed as
“heart of drug master file” and can prove to be the toughest part for
compilation of drug master file. All possible impurities should be identified,
listed and described. A discussion should be included for control of
impurities. Below is example for listing of impurities in tabular form:
Sr.
No.
|
impurity
name & structure
|
Type
of impurity/ source of impurity
|
01.
|
Abc
|
Process
related impurity
|
02.
|
Xyz
|
Degradation
impurity
|
3.2.S.4 Control of Drug Substance #
3.2.S.4.1 Specification
The specification for the
drug substance should be provided.
3.2.S.4.2 Analytical Procedures #
The analytical procedures
used for testing the drug substance should be provided.
3.2.S.4.3 Validation of Analytical Procedures #
Analytical validation
information, including experimental data for the analytical procedures used for
testing the drug substance, should be provided.
3.2.S.4.4 Batch Analyses #
Description of batches
and results of batch analyses should be provided.
3.2.S.4.5
Justification of Specification #
Justification for the
drug substance specification should be provided.
3.2.S.5 Reference Standards or Materials #
Information on the
reference standards or reference materials used for testing of the drug
substance should be provided.
3.2.S.6 Container Closure System #
A description of the
container closure system(s) should be provided, including the identity of
materials of construction of each primary packaging component, and their
specifications. The specifications should include description and
identification (and critical dimensions with drawings, where appropriate). Non-compendial
methods (with validation) should be included, where appropriate.
The suitability should be
discussed with respect to, for example, choice of materials, protection from
moisture and light, compatibility of the materials of construction with the drug
substance, including sorption to container and leaching, and/or safety of
materials of construction.
3.2.S.7 Stability #
3.2.S.7.1 Stability Summary and Conclusions
The types of studies
conducted, protocols used, and the results of the studies should be summarized.
The summary should include results, for example, from forced degradation
studies and stress conditions, as well as conclusions with respect to storage
conditions and retest date or shelf-life, as appropriate.
3.2.S.7.2 Post-approval Stability Protocol and Stability Commitment
The post-approval
stability protocol and stability commitment should be provided.
3.2.S.7.3 Stability Data
Results of the stability
studies (e.g., forced degradation studies and stress conditions) should be
presented in an appropriate format such as tabular, graphical, or narrative.
Information on the analytical procedures used to generate the data and
validation of these procedures should be included.
Thank you for summarizing the guideline in simple language.
ReplyDeleteAlways welcome and thank you as well for your comments.
DeleteSummarized well and very informative. Kidos to your efforts
ReplyDeleteThank you very much for the appreciation.
DeleteVery helpful.
ReplyDeleteThanks a lot..
Delete